The review was made by the Multi-State Learning Collaborative assessment group at the University of Southern Maine's Muskie School. The instrument was intended to:

Identify elements of an association that might improve or blocking QI approaches

Monitor the effect of endeavors to make a more great environment for QI to thrive

Define potential companions of general wellbeing organizations for assessment purposes

Contact Information:

For more data on the QI Maturity Tool, including its improvement, unwavering quality, legitimacy, organization and scoring, please contact Brenda Joly at 207-228-8456 or bjoly@usm.maine.edu

Favored Citation:

Joly BM, Booth M, Mittal P, Shaler G. (2012). Measuring Quality Improvement in Public Health: The Development what's more, Psychometric Testing of a QI Maturity Tool. Assessment and the Health Professions, 35(2) 119-147.

On the other hand

Joly BM, Booth M, Mittal P, Zhang Y. (2013). Grouping Public Health Agencies Along a Quality Improvement Continuum. Outskirts in Public Health Services and Systems Research Vol. 2: No. 3, Article 2



QI Maturity Tool